Choosing the right engineering plastic for a machined part is one of those decisions that looks simple on paper and turns out to be surprisingly nuanced. I've seen datasheets lead engineers to the wrong material more times than I can count — not because the datasheet was wrong, but because it didn't capture what happens on a shop floor.

Here's a practical framework for narrowing down your options, based on the materials we machine every day.

Start with temperature

This is the fastest way to eliminate candidates:

Continuous service temperature (UL746B rating) is more useful than short-term HDT. A PPS part rated at 200°C continuous will survive brief excursions to 260°C, but don't design around the excursion unless you've tested it.

Chemical exposure

If the part touches anything other than air or water, check compatibility:

When in doubt, request chemical compatibility data from the material supplier for your specific chemical, concentration, and temperature. Generic "excellent chemical resistance" claims are not enough.

Mechanical load

High structural load: PEEK. It's the strongest and toughest of the group. PAI if the temperature demands it, but only if you can handle the brittleness and cost.

Moderate load, lower cost: PPS (glass-filled). Good strength, much cheaper than PEEK.

Low load, primarily sealing or insulating: PTFE or unfilled PPS. The soft option that handles chemistry and temperature.

Impact or shock loading: PEEK. PPS and PAI are too brittle. PEI can work for moderate impact below 170°C.

Wear and sliding: Filled PEEK (carbon fiber or PTFE-filled) for most applications. Filled PAI (Torlon 4301) for high-temperature wear. Filled PTFE for low-load, low-friction.

Dimensional stability

If your part has tight tolerances (under ±0.05mm):

For precision parts that span wide temperature ranges, factor thermal expansion into the tolerance budget. A 100mm PEEK part grows about 0.05mm per 1°C.

Cost sensitivity

Rough cost ranking (unfilled grades, relative):

  1. PTFE (least expensive)
  2. PPS
  3. PVDF
  4. PEI
  5. PEEK
  6. PAI
  7. PI (most expensive)

Glass or carbon fiber fillers add 15-30% to the base material cost. The premium for higher-temp or stronger materials is real, but field failures from choosing the cheaper option always cost more.

A quick decision flow

  1. What's the max continuous temperature? → Eliminate anything rated below it.
  2. What chemicals does it touch? → Eliminate anything incompatible. When unsure, PTFE or PEEK.
  3. What's the mechanical demand? → Structural = PEEK or PPS. Low load seal/gasket = PTFE.
  4. What tolerances do you need? → Tight = PAI, PI, PPS, or PEEK with thermal management.
  5. What's the budget? → PPS and PTFE for cost-sensitive. PEEK for demanding. PAI/PI when nothing else works.

We stock the full range and can help you narrow the choice. Send your drawing and tell us what the part needs to do — we'll give you a recommendation based on what actually works, not what looks good on a comparison chart.